| Bozzoli (1975) |
The Commission on Trade and Industries (Cullinan Commission), U.G. 10, 1912 |
1912 |
Shows the official response to manufacturers' lobbying: a minority report opposed to industry and a half-hearted majority report for protection. |
| Fedderke and Simkins (2004) |
Cullinan Commission on Trade and Industries 1910-11 and Board of Trade and Industries (1945) report |
1910-1945 |
Source of the tariff principles guiding industrial protection and the 1939 import duty rate of 14.25%. |
| Houghton and Dagut (n.d.) |
Report of the Commission on Trade and Industries, 1912 (U.G. 10-'12) |
1912 |
Argues for protection and includes a retail price comparison table of South Africa, Britain and the US. |
| Lumby (1974) |
Report of the Commission on Conditions of Trade and Industries (Cullinan Commission), U.G.10/1912 |
1910-1912 |
Evidence on pre-war tariff policy, industry conditions (footwear, printing employment) and obstacles to industrialisation. |
| Nattrass (1976a) |
Report of the Commission on Conditions of Trade and Industries UG 10-12/1912 |
1912 |
Cited for rising Johannesburg living costs and for the official view that agriculture must develop first. |
| Schirmer (2008) |
Cullinan Commission Report (UG) |
c.1912 |
Cited for cement/brick/pottery scale and transport-cost problems and for the tanning industry's natural advantages by 1912. |