Corporate submissions to the TRC
Literature › Primary sources
|
|
| Kind |
company records or reports |
| Producer |
Individual corporations |
| Coverage |
1997 |
| Works using it |
2 |
Debates
Works using this source
| Work |
As cited |
Period |
How used |
| Nattrass (1999a) |
Corporate submissions to the TRC (Anglo American, Old Mutual, SAB, Tongaat-Hulett, SANLAM, Armscor) |
1997 |
Quoted to show how firms denied culpability, apologised, or defended their role (e.g. Anglo married accommodation, Armscor, Tongaat-Hulett ill-treatment). |
| Nattrass (1999b) |
Armscor Draft Submission to the TRC |
October 1997 |
Illustrates second-order involvement and the difficulty of establishing knowledge of intended use. |
| Nattrass (1999b) |
Submissions from large corporations to the TRC (Anglo American, Old Mutual, SAB, Tongaat-Hulett, SANLAM, Armscor) |
1997 |
Used to document corporate defences, apologies and admissions (e.g. Anglo's failure to provide married accommodation, Armscor's denial of knowing facilitation). |