Solving the 'Labour Problem': Race, Work and the State in the Sugar Industries of Louisiana and Natal, 1870-1910¶
Rick Halpern (2004). Solving the 'Labour Problem': Race, Work and the State in the Sugar Industries of Louisiana and Natal, 1870-1910. Journal of Southern African Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Special Issue: Race and Class in South Africa and the United States). Taylor & Francis (Carfax Publishing).
| Type | journal article |
| Scope | Wider apartheid literature |
| Method | archival narrative |
| Period studied | 1870–1910 |
| Regions | Natal, Zululand, Louisiana (US South), India (indentured labour source) |
| Themes | origins segregation, agriculture land, labour markets wages, business and state, comparative theory, mining migrant labour |
| Citation key | halpern2004 |
Argument¶
Sugar planters in Louisiana and Natal both framed a racialised 'labour problem', believing black labour unsuited to cane, and both sought new workforces, a racialised division of labour and state backing. Outcomes diverged sharply. Natal planters used the British imperial system to import over 150,000 Indian indentured labourers and freed themselves from reliance on African workers, whereas Louisiana's planters failed with Chinese and Italian labour and stayed dependent on African Americans. Two variables explain this: the state of the world sugar economy (Natal expanding, Louisiana declining) and, more crucially, the very different capacities of the state (an efficient imperial/colonial labour-migration apparatus versus a weak local state and an indifferent, free-trade federal one). The comparison shows how race and class were entwined in labour recruitment and control.
Evidence and method¶
Secondary literature (Richardson, Tinker, Tayal, Cohen, Scarpaci, Sitterson, Heitmann, Hair, Rodrigue, Atkins); planter papers and letterbooks at LSU's LLMVC (Caffery, Gay, Pugh, Uncle Sam Plantation payrolls); planter trade press (Louisiana Planter and Sugar Manufacturer, Natal Mercury); Public Record Office colonial office despatches; Louisiana crop reports; Protector of Indian Immigrants reports as used by Tayal.
Place in the debates¶
- Role of the state in solving planters' labour problems (comparative US South/Natal). Argues state capacity was the decisive variable: Natal's imperial and colonial state delivered cheap, controlled indentured labour, while Louisiana's local and federal states were unreliable allies.
- Whether Louisiana sugar workers were silenced after Thibodaux (Scott). Criticises Rebecca Scott for overstating the case; resistance continued, though in isolated and individual forms.
- Quiescence of Indian indentured labourers (Tayal). Says Tayal overstates their quiescence, but accepts that tight controls stifled collective protest and left mainly passive resistance.
- Whether Italians were cheaper and more productive than African Americans. Sceptical: little evidence from planters' accounts that Italians were cheaper to maintain, and payroll analysis is inconclusive on field-job advantages.
Findings¶
-
Natal's state secured large-scale Indian indenture that made commercial sugar viable. (p. 9)
colonial authorities secured over 150,000 Indian indentured labourers from Calcutta and Madras, the vast majority of whom worked on the sugar estates and made possible viable commercial production.
-
Indenture contracts fixed wages well below the colonial market, with lax enforcement that cut costs further. (p. 9)
These rates of pay were far below those prevailing within the colony, even when the additional costs of food and lodging are considered.
-
Colonial costs of indenture were shifted onto African cultivators rather than planters. (p. 9)
the administrative costs accruing to the colony were not thrown back on the growers through taxes but were met by a levy on African cultivators
-
The 1894 indenture law strengthened planters' control, and Indian indentured numbers rose sharply. (p. 16)
The dramatic rise in the number of Indian indentures from 8,500 in 1890 to over 15,500 at the end of the decade (and again to 24,000 shortly after the end of the South African War)
-
The 1890 Natal Code of Native Law and wage-fixing used the state to compel African labour for public works and land clearance. (p. 15)
the colony's Executive Council fixed 'native' wage rates across the whole of Natal, thus decreasing competition for African labour.
-
Zululand annexation delivered vast land to sugar interests, enabling scale far beyond Louisiana's. (p. 14)
The new Zululand estates were 30 to 40 times that size. Heaton Nicholls, one of the first pioneers to set up operations in Zululand's Umfolozi area, commenced with a land grant of 73,313 acres.
-
Louisiana's 1887 Thibodaux massacre ended organised labour protest but did not produce a tractable workforce. (p. 6)
The Thibodaux Massacre marked the end of organised labour protest in Louisiana's sugar parishes.
-
Chinese contract labour failed in Louisiana partly because local state institutions would not enforce discipline and the prison competed for workers. (p. 11)
Louisiana not only declined to enforce labour discipline at Millaudon, but its prison competed with agriculture for Chinese workers.
-
Italian labour had a racially intermediate status that gave planters flexible uses for it. (p. 19)
as non-whites, planters could subject them to severe labour discipline and accommodate them in inferior housing; as 'nearly white', their employers could trust them with skilled sugar house jobs
-
Italian immigration collapsed because of workers' mobility and lynching-driven pressure from the Italian government. (p. 22)
by 1910 Italian immigration to the sugar region had fallen off dramatically.
-
Louisiana's decline stemmed from structural changes in the world sugar economy and tariff policy, not just labour. (p. 22)
With US possession of the former Spanish colonies of Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines, cheap tariff-free sugar threatened to overwhelm the domestic market.
Evidence ledger¶
Sources used¶
| Source | Kind | Period | How used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Immigration, Crop Report (monthly crop reports, 1885/1888-1910) | official statistical series | 1885-1910 | Cited as showing a clear picture of the labour shortage in the sugar parishes. |
| Donelson Caffery and Family Papers, Letterbooks (LLMVC, LSU), incl. Mary W. Pugh Papers | state archives | 1870s-1900s | Planter letters evidence attitudes to black labour, diversification, the tariff and the Cuba annexation; Pugh's letter on the Thibodaux massacre. |
| Edward J. Gay and Family Papers; Andrew Hynes Gay and Family Papers (LLMVC) | state archives | 1870-1892 | Letters document planter views on black, Swedish, German and Chinese labour and the Chinese contract agreement. |
| Uncle Sam Plantation Financial Records and 1890 Payroll series (LLMVC) | company records or reports | 1890s | Payroll records examined preliminarily for Italian versus African-American field job allocation; financial records for debt bondage. |
| Louisiana Sugar Planters' Association Papers (LLMVC) and Leroy Percy Papers, Oxnard Papers, Warmoth Plantation Journal | employer association records | 1892-1913 | Correspondence on Italian immigration, a diary of Italians' departure, and a 1892 tenant versus wage cost comparison. |
| Louisiana Planter and Sugar Manufacturer / Louisiana Sugar Bowl / Planters' Banner / Sugar Planters' Journal / Natal Mercury | newspapers periodicals | 1855-1907 | Quoted for planter attitudes to labour, Chinese and Italian workers, and Natal planters' labour difficulties and indenture. |
| Year Book of the Louisiana Sugar Cane Industry, 1939; A. Bouchereau, Statement of the Sugar Crop Made in Louisiana in 1897-98 | official statistical series | 1889-1904 | Source for Louisiana sugar tonnage (347,000 tons in 1897) and comparison with Java and Cuba. |
| Testimony of John Dymond before the House Ways and Means Committee, 7 January 1889 | parliamentary debates | 1889 | Evidence for size of Louisiana plantations (1,000-1,500 acres) versus Zululand estates. |
| Journal of the House (Louisiana), 1880 | legislation gazette | 1880 | Documents the state's attempt to bar Chinese immigration in 1880. |
| US Department of Commerce, The Cane Sugar Industry: Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Market Costs in Hawaii, Porto Rico, Louisiana, and Cuba, Misc. Series No. 53 (1917) | commission or official report | 1917 | Supports Louisiana's backward technology and cost disadvantage relative to competitors. |
| Annual Report of the Protector of Indian Immigrants 1911 (CO 551/27/19319, PRO London) | commission or official report | 1911 | Used for the figure of at least 150,000 Indian indentured labourers imported, noting contradictory statistics. |
| Colonial Office files CO 179 (Natal despatches, reports on native labour, Gazette bill, Governor-General correspondence) | state archives | 1890-1913 | Evidence for forced African labour on public works (1,866 employed), cattle purchase restrictions, liquor bill, and complaints about indenture abuses. |
| Indian indenture contract terms and wage rates (via secondary accounts of the Government of India contracts) | legislation gazette | 1860-1911 | Establishes indentured wages (10 shillings monthly rising a shilling per year) set below local rates. |
| M. Tayal, 'Indian Indentured Labour in Natal, 1890-1911' (based on Protector of Indian Immigrants annual reports) | secondary literature compilation | 1890-1911 | Source for working conditions, controls over Indian labourers, indenture numbers (8,500 in 1890 to 24,000), and Protector's weakness. |
| J. A. Scarpaci, 'Italian Immigrants in Louisiana's Sugar Parishes' (PhD thesis, Rutgers, 1972) | secondary literature compilation | 1880-1910 | Source for Italian numbers (10,000 by 1900), working conditions, and quotations from planters. |
| L. M. Cohen, Chinese in the Post-Civil War South (1984) | secondary literature compilation | 1870-1871 | Main source for the Chinese contract labour experiments, including 141 labourers and contract terms. |
| Heaton Nicholls, South Africa in My Time (memoir); Atkins, The Moon is Dead!; Richardson essays on Natal sugar | secondary literature compilation | 1849-1905 | Source for Zululand land grants, the Zululand Sugar Agreement, planter testimony on African work discipline, and the St Lucia Sugar Company. |
Inference¶
Quantification: Illustrative figures.
Qualitative comparative historical case study of two sugar regions that relies on planter correspondence, trade press, official reports and secondary literature, and uses structured comparison to attribute the divergent outcomes to world-market position and state capacity.
Key claims¶
| Claim | Basis | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Natal planters used the British imperial and colonial state to secure over 150,000 cheap, tightly controlled Indian indentured labourers, who made commercial sugar production viable. (p. 26) | Protector of Indian Immigrants report 1911 (via PRO), Natal Mercury, Richardson and Tayal; the author notes that the figures are contradictory. | Partial data |
| Louisiana planters failed to replace African-American labour with Chinese contract workers because of workers' mobility and resistance, and because the local state would not enforce contracts and competed for workers through its penitentiary. (p. 30) | Cohen's study plus Gay family papers and planter newspaper commentary. | Illustrative or anecdotal |
| Louisiana's sugar industry was in structural decline, in contrast to Natal's expansion, owing to soil exhaustion, small units, backward technology, and the loss of bounties and tariff protection after 1894 and 1898. (p. 39) | Production tonnage from industry yearbooks, Caffery letters, Commerce Department report, and Heitmann and Sitterson. | Partial data |
| Italian immigrants were racialised as 'in-between' labour and given skilled sugarhouse jobs, but were highly mobile and discouraged by lynchings and Italian government action, so they did not solve the labour problem. (p. 38) | Scarpaci thesis, planter diaries and correspondence, trade press, and newspaper reports of lynchings; payroll analysis only preliminary. | Partial data |
| Thibodaux in 1887 ended organised black labour protest, and the state's power became available to planters after Redemption; wages stayed depressed and coercive debt practices became the norm. (p. 23) | Secondary accounts (Hair, Rodrigue, Becnel), Pugh and Caffery letters; the author notes that hard evidence on the Knights is difficult to obtain. | Illustrative or anecdotal |
| Natal's expansion at the turn of the century rested on state land policy (annexed Zululand, large 99-year grants), imperial capital, and state-coerced African labour for land clearing and public works. (p. 31) | Brookes and Webb, Nicholls, Richardson, and Colonial Office despatches on native labour. | Partial data |
| Indentured Indians in Natal were subject to harsh controls, and the Protector's office largely served planters, including the post-1894 regulations and sirdar system. (p. 33) | Tayal's use of Protector reports, Tinker, Swan, and Colonial Office files; the author concedes that hard evidence on working conditions is spotty. | Partial data |
The author's caveats¶
Acknowledges that exact numbers of Indian indentured labourers are hard to establish because statistics are contradictory, that hard evidence on the Knights of Labor and on Natal working conditions is difficult to obtain or spotty, that payroll analyses are preliminary, that there is little evidence Italians were cheaper to maintain, and that more research is needed on race-making processes.
Gaps in the evidence¶
The comparison rests on planter correspondence, press and secondary studies rather than systematic quantitative series on wages, labour costs, workforce composition and productivity for both regions. Wage and cost series from plantation account books, the Natal Blue Books and Protector reports, and US census and crop data could test the claims of cheap Indian labour and Italian cost advantages. Many of these sources existed then and survive in archives, but the article samples a few elite planter families (Gay, Caffery) and limited Natal archive files.
Replicability: Data described but not public.