White Capital and Coloured Labour (new edition, rewritten and revised; first published 1906)

Literature › Works

Olivier, Sydney (Lord Olivier) (1929). White Capital and Coloured Labour (new edition, rewritten and revised; first published 1906). Hogarth Press, London.

Type	book
Scope	Economics and economic history of apartheid
Method	synthesis review
Period studied	1880s–1929
Regions	South Africa, Kenya, Rhodesia, Jamaica and British West Indies, West Africa, Portuguese Africa, US South
Themes	origins segregation, mining migrant labour, agriculture land, labour markets wages, unions strikes, politics ideology elections, business and state, resistance social movements, bantustans removals influx, comparative theory
Citation key	olivier1929

Argument

A socialist and former Colonial Office official argues that the modern partition of Africa was a project of 'Capitalist Imperialism', a reversion to the slave-era pattern of white capital seeking black labour. He claims that land alienation, hut and poll taxes, pass laws, Masters' and Servants' laws, compounds and the colour bar are devices for manufacturing a labour supply from Africans who would otherwise live from their own land. He draws on the Jamaican and West African experience to argue that peasant proprietorship and education, not compulsion, produce reliable labour and social peace. South Africa, with its Native Land Act, Native Affairs Regulation Law and Colour-Bar Law, is presented as the extreme case, in which the interests of white capital and white labour combine against African workers. He also condemns the race-theory prejudices of the 'short view' and calls for a 'trusteeship' that would limit European exploitation.

Evidence and method

The 1905 South African Native Affairs Commission report and the 1925-26 Economic and Wages Commission, quoted at length. Evidence before the 1927 Select Committee on General Hertzog's Native Bills, Kenya government circulars and the 'Bishops' Memorandum', and the Phelps-Stokes Commission and East Africa Commission reports. Also Ross and Cramer on Angola, private letters on Mozambique, Jamaican Agricultural Society records, press extracts, and the author's own colonial service (West Indies, South Africa, West Africa).

Place in the debates

• Cheap labour thesis / origins of segregation and its link to capital (see Cheap labour thesis and the function of the reserves). An early statement of the view that land dispossession, taxation and labour controls were designed to supply cheap African labour to mines and farms. He sees the labour 'shortage' as created by foreign capital's demand, not by African idleness.
• Liberal vs revisionist on race prejudice and capitalism (see Liberal vs revisionist: was apartheid functional or dysfunctional for capitalist growth?). Holds that race prejudice is largely a product of the industrial employer-employee relation and of economic competition. It is not primordial, and a colour-blind state policy is the remedy.
• Cape liberalism vs Northern (Boer/Natal) native policy (see Pre-Union colonial economy, the mineral revolution and the South African War). Favours the Cape and Colonial Office liberal tradition against the Afrikander and Northern Provinces approach. He is critical of Hertzog's pact between the Nationalists and white Labour.
• African 'idleness' and the target-worker / backward-sloping labour supply (see The mine migrant labour system: origins, recruitment, foreign labour and stabilisation). Rejects the idleness charge, but accepts that Africans with access to land supply wage labour intermittently and respond weakly to higher wages. He explains this by access to land and limited wants.
• Compulsion vs peasant development as the basis of labour supply (see The mine migrant labour system: origins, recruitment, foreign labour and stabilisation). Argues that compulsion fails and that improving African agriculture itself produces a willing labour supply.

Findings

• Modern African colonisation is presented as a pure case of white capital confronting coloured labour (the core thesis of the 1929 edition). (p. 15)

  affords, in fact, an exceptionally pure demonstration of the interaction of White Capital and Coloured Labour

• Where Africans retain land, capital cannot command their labour, which is why land alienation underpins labour supply. (p. 93)

  Capital has no control over labour so long as labour has lind on which it can support itself.

• The rise of mining attracted white miners and artisans who, fearing African competition, adopted Boer-style exclusion of Africans from skilled work. (p. 121)

  came to adopt a view of the native and his rights practically similar to that of the Boer and to co-operate with the Dutch African party in an endeavour deliberately to exclude him

• The 1925-26 Economic and Wages Commission acknowledged that taxation and other devices had made the African dependent on employment in white areas. (p. 124)

  it was for too long the policy of the Union to drive the native by taxation and other devices to work for Europeans for it to be possible now to exclude him from the field of employment he is occupying.

• Olivier argues the labour 'shortage' reflects the demand of foreign mining capital, not a lack of labour for local needs. (p. 132)

  The demand for labour referred to is not a need of the community as an organic self-contained society.

• Government witnesses to the 1927 Select Committee said land shortage and impoverishment were pushing Africans into wage labour. (p. 158)

  I do think the natives are getting poorer and are so being forced to go to work for the white man.

• Loram's figures show the extreme disparity in rural land between whites and Africans. (p. 159)

  That is, each rural white has on the average 451 times as much land as each rural black.

• The Chamber of Mines drafted pass regulations for the Transvaal government, showing that the northern pass system arose from mining capital's demands. (p. 267)

  Mines drafted Pass regulations and handed them to the Government of the South Mrican Republic.

• The 1926 Colour-Bar Law is treated as industrial repression by white workers and as the trigger for African unionism (the ICU). (p. 271)

  But the Colour-Bar Law was a direct declaration of a war of industrial repression on the part of the white worker against the black

• African workers have no legal right to strike, since all fall under the Masters' and Servants' laws. (p. 272)

  There are no free labourers in South Africa. All natives are employed under the Masters' and Servants' Laws, and it is a penal offence to strike.

Evidence ledger

Sources used

Source	Kind	Period	How used
Report of the South African Native Affairs Commission, 1905	commission or official report	1903-1905	Extensively quoted (by section number) for native labour supply and demand, land, taxation and compulsion recommendations, and as evidence of employers' views of native labour.
Report of the East Africa Commission (Ormsby-Gore), Cmd. 2387, 1925	commission or official report	1924-1925	Quoted on alleged native idleness and land granted exceeding available labour; criticised and rebutted by the Kavirondo memorandum.
Kavirondo Taxpayers' Welfare Association memorandum to Hilton Young's Commission	union or movement records	c.1928	Lists men's agricultural and other work to refute the claim that African men are idle.
Report of the Commission on Closer Union of Eastern and Central Africa (Hilton Young), Cmd. 3234, 1929	commission or official report	1929	Quoted for the principle of paramountcy of native interests and need for land for every native.
Report of the Phelps-Stokes Education Commission on East Central and South Africa (chapter by L. T. Shantz)	commission or official report	c.1924	Used for estimates of native agricultural population, taxation per head, and defence of African agricultural methods.
Kenya Labour Circular No. 1 of 23 October 1919 (Chief Native Commissioner Ainsworth) and explanatory circulars	state archives	1919	Reproduced in full to show official pressure on chiefs and officials to supply labour to settlers.
Bishops' Memorandum (Mombasa, Uganda, Church of Scotland Mission) 1919-20 and Lord Milner's/Churchill's despatches on native labour (July 1920, 5 Sept 1921)	commission or official report	1919-1921	Traces controversy over compulsory labour and the government's draft ordinance and its withdrawal.
Bishop Frank Weston, The Serfs of Great Britain pamphlet and biography extracts	newspapers periodicals	1920-1921	Describes Zanzibar decrees of 1917 and 1919 and East African labour proposals, and the moral case against forced labour.
Report by W. A. Ormsby-Gore on his visit to West Africa 1926 [Cmd. 2744]	commission or official report	1926	Quoted on use of compulsory labour for Nigerian railways and roads.
Mrs M. A. Buxton, Kenya Days (settler account with wage and tax figures for Wakamba)	secondary literature compilation	1920s	Population, tax and wage figures used to compute implied tax burden on Wakamba.
Royal Commission on Jamaica 1883, statement by Rev. Josiah Cork	commission or official report	1883	Evidence on post-emancipation rents, wages, land purchase and taxation.
Labour and Socialist International Congress, Brussels 1928, The Colonial Problem	union or movement records	1928	Quoted at length as a charter of demands on colonial labour and land.
Author's personal observation as Colonial Office official and resident in Jamaica 1897-1913	author survey or fieldwork	1882-1913	The main basis for the comparative claims on Jamaican race relations and peasant development.

Inference

Quantification: Illustrative figures.

Comparative and argumentative essay: draws on the author's colonial service experience and long extracts from official commission reports, committee evidence and press to compare the West Indies, US, South Africa, Kenya and Portuguese Africa, and interprets them through a socialist critique of 'Capitalist Imperialism'; arithmetic is occasional (e.g. Wakamba tax per head, land per rural white/black).

Key claims

Claim	Basis	Strength
The South African 'labour shortage' was created by foreign capital's demand for mine labour rather than any native indolence; the Native Affairs Commission itself rejected the idleness charge. (p. 131)	1905 Native Affairs Commission sections 372-375 and its supply/demand estimates (475,000 supply vs 782,000 demand; Transvaal 374,000 vs 90,695), interpreted by the author.	Partial data
Land allocation, taxation and rents in South Africa drive natives into wage labour; whites hold vastly more land per head than blacks. (p. 158)	Select Committee evidence of Roberts and Loram (morgen per rural white vs rural black), census district declines, Commission annexure figures and landowners' rent evidence.	Partial data
Kenyan officials and the Colonial Office deliberately pressured natives to labour for settlers through circulars, taxation and draft ordinances, producing a forced labour controversy. (p. 229)	Reproduced Labour Circular of 1919, Bishops' Memorandum, Native Authority ordinances and Churchill's 1921 despatch.	Systematic data
Kenya's Wakamba are oppressively overtaxed, with most taxation supporting the white community's economy. (p. 216)	Buxton's figures (288,000 population, £70,000 tax, 15% working, wages 12s a month) combined with a Labour report on reserve production (70s-90s per family), calculated by the author.	Partial data
The Colour-Bar Law and white labour policy in South Africa reflect white wage-earners' competition with native workers, and have prompted African unionisation (ICU) and some white labour cooperation. (p. 171)	Select Committee evidence, Economic and Wages Commission minority, press accounts of Madeley affair and ICU-TUC meetings.	Illustrative or anecdotal

The author's caveats

Olivier acknowledges that his Jamaican experience is dated (visits to the US about twenty years earlier), says of the Kenya tax figures "I do not vouch for the accuracy of these figures", and notes that Commission members had no reliable data on reserve land flows. He frames the book as argument and not a comprehensive study of race.

Gaps in the evidence

The argument that capital's labour demand drives coercion needs systematic data: mine and farm wage series, compound and recruitment records of the Chamber of Mines, native tax revenue and census-based labour flows by district. Most evidence consists of selective quotations of witnesses and commissions plus the author's impressions; no counterfactuals or quantified comparison of Jamaica vs Africa exist. Such statistical and archival material existed (union and colonial records, censuses, Blue Books) and is now accessible for testing the claims.

Replicability: Data poorly documented.