| Bonner and Shapiro (1987) |
Native Economic Commission 1931-2 evidence (CPSA Archives): replies to questionnaires by Assistant Native Commissioner Graskop, Lydenburg Magistrate, Zoutpansberg |
1931-1932 |
Supports claims on clandestine immigration, the length of time to work off tickets and women in the compounds. |
| Davenport (1969) |
Report of the Native Economic Commission, 1930-1932 (Holloway), UG 22-1932 |
1930-1932 |
Shows the Commission retained existing urban restrictions but declined to propose more. |
| Delius and Schirmer (2000) |
Report of the Native Economic Commission 1930-1932 |
1930-1932 |
Shows the official diagnosis of overstocking and erosion in the reserves, and is criticised for the thin evidence behind its predictions. |
| Edgecombe (1987) |
Native Economic Commission 1930-32 evidence (K26, vols 4 and 9), Central Archives Depot |
1930-1931 |
Witness testimony on beer quality, indebtedness and compulsion in the token system, and on labour requirements of the gold mines. |
| Higginson (1992) |
Native Economic Commission (South Africa) hearings and testimonies, 1931-32 (Durban, Capetown, Johannesburg, Pietermaritzburg) |
1930-1932 |
Testimony of Africans, welfare-society officials and union leaders supplies evidence on pass riots, dock work, wages, rents and the changing urban labour force. |
| Houghton and Dagut (1973) |
Report of the Native Economic Commission, 1932, U.G. 22/1932 |
1932 |
Describes the economy of the Reserves, overstocking and erosion on the basis of commissioners' observations. |
| Jeeves (1987) |
Archive of the Native Economic Commission, 1930-2 (K26) evidence |
1930-1932 |
Evidence by mine managers and others on the AVS and on medical examination of recruits. |
| Katzen (1974) |
Native Economic Commission report, 1932 |
1932 |
Cited as the earliest origin of the Border Industries idea, through its proposals to improve and develop reserve agriculture. |
| Keegan (1985) |
U.G. 22-1932, Report of the Natives Economic Commission, 1930-32 |
1930-1932 |
Evidence of Archdeacon Hill showing the post-1913 shift from half shares to labour tenancy on a company farm. |
| Knight (1976a) |
Report of the Native Economic Commission 1930-32 (UG 22-1932) |
1930-1932 |
Qualitative evidence of growing impoverishment, land shortage and landlessness in reserves. |
| Maylam (1990) |
Report of the Native Economic Commission, 1930-32, U.G. 22, 1932 |
1932 |
Cited as expressing official recognition of the stabilisation and permanence of urban African labour. |
| Morrell (1988) |
Native Economic Commission (1930) evidence (Kuhlmann; Bosman and Williams) |
1930 |
Kuhlmann's testimony on labour diversion and farmers' complaints about recruiting agents. |
| Sabbagh (1968) |
Report of the Native Economic Commission (1932) and Social and Economic Planning Council Report No. 9 (1946) |
1932, 1946 |
Cited as earlier official investigations preparing the ground for Separate Development. |
| Schirmer (1994) |
Native Economic Commission 1930, Lydenburg evidence (WHPL AD 438/AD1438), including Isaac Twale and Major D.R. Hunt |
1930 |
Testimony that reserves were full and land in Lydenburg was attractive. |
| Simkins (1981) |
Native Economic Commission Report 1930-2 and Report of the Commission into Native Reserves 1946 (hide and skin prices) |
1930-1946 |
Cited via Wolpe's account as part of the received view; the 1946 report supplies the 1939 hide price. |
| Simkins (1984a) |
Native Economic Commission Report 1930-32 (wage tabulations) |
c.1930 |
Cited through the Native Farm Labour Committee, which warrants treating per capita cash and kind incomes as constant from 1929 to 1939. |
| Simkins (1984b) |
Native Economic Commission Report 1930-32 wage tabulations |
late 1920s-1932 |
Via the Farm Labour Committee, used to justify constant per capita real incomes 1929-39. |